USC
W-L: ( 9- 3) PR = 88.7370Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 830 H Missouri St ( 7- 5, 71.9) 73-13 906 H Georgia So SUN ( 7- 6, 71.6) 59-20 913 A Purdue B10 ( 2-10, 73.8) 33-17 920 H Michigan St B10 ( 4- 8, 75.8) 45-31 927 A Illinois B10 ( 8- 4, 85.1) 32-34 1011 H Michigan B10 ( 9- 3, 86.2) 31-13 1018 A Notre Dame IND (10- 2, 95.0) 24-34 1101 A Nebraska B10 ( 7- 5, 79.7) 21-17 1107 H Northwestern B10 ( 6- 6, 79.4) 38-17 1115 H Iowa B10 ( 8- 4, 87.9) 26-21 1122 A Oregon B10 (11- 1, 94.0) 27-42 1129 H UCLA B10 ( 3- 9, 77.0) 29-10
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
830 H Missouri St 73-13 60 19 0.00
906 H Georgia So 59-20 39 20 0.00
913 A Purdue 33-17 16 12 1.78
920 H Michigan St 45-31 14 16 0.00
927 A Illinois 32-34 -2 1 - -2.94
1011 H Michigan 31-13 18 5 +++ 8.80
1018 A Notre Dame 24-34 -10 -9 -1.10
1101 A Nebraska 21-17 4 6 - -2.35
1107 H Northwestern 38-17 21 12 + 2.02
1115 H Iowa 26-21 5 4 1.48
1122 A Oregon 27-42 -15 -8 --- -6.08
1129 H UCLA 29-10 19 14 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1122 A Oregon 27-42 -15 -8 --- -6.08 927 A Illinois 32-34 -2 1 - -2.94 1101 A Nebraska 21-17 4 6 - -2.35 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1011 H Michigan 31-13 18 5 +++ 8.80 1107 H Northwestern 38-17 21 12 + 2.02 |
USC Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Col ` | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | USC | |
| California | USC | USC | ||
| Clemson | USC | USC | ||
| Duke | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Florida St | USC | USC | ||
| Georgia Tech | USC | USC | ||
| Louisville | USC | USC | ||
| Miami | Miami | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Miami | |
| UNC | USC | USC | ||
| NC St | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Pittsburgh | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| SMU | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Stanford | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Syracuse | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Virginia | USC | USC | ||
| Va Tech | USC | USC | ||
| Wake Forest | USC | USC | ||
| Army | USC | USC | ||
| Charlotte | USC | USC | ||
| Ea Carolina | USC | USC | ||
| Fla Atlantic | USC | USC | ||
| Memphis | USC | USC | ||
| Navy | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| No Texas | USC | USC | ||
| Rice | USC | USC | ||
| So Florida | USC | USC | ||
| Temple | USC | USC | ||
| Tulane | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Tulsa | USC | USC | ||
| UAB | USC | USC | ||
| UTSA | USC | USC | ||
| Arizona | USC | USC | ||
| Arizona St | USC | USC | ||
| BYU | BYU | BYU | ||
| Baylor | USC | USC | ||
| Cincinnati | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Colorado | USC | USC | ||
| Houston | USC | USC | ||
| Iowa St | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Kansas | USC | USC | ||
| Kansas St | USC | USC | ||
| Oklahoma St | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| TCU | USC | USC | ||
| Texas Tech | Texas Tech | Texas Tech | ||
| UCF | USC | USC | ||
| Utah | Utah | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Utah | |
| We Virginia | USC | USC | ||
| Illinois | Illinois | Illinois | ||
| Indiana | Indiana | Indiana 6- 0 vs 4- 2 | ||
| Iowa | USC | USC | ||
| Maryland | USC | USC 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Michigan | USC | USC | ||
| Michigan St | USC | USC | ||
| Minnesota | USC | USC 5- 1 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Nebraska | USC | USC | ||
| Northwestern | USC | USC | ||
| Ohio St | Ohio St | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) | Ohio St | |
| Oregon | Oregon | Oregon | ||
| Penn St | USC | USC 5- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Purdue | USC | USC | ||
| Rutgers | USC | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | USC | |
| UCLA | USC | USC | ||
| Washington | USC | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | USC | |
| Wisconsin | USC | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | USC | |
| Florida Intl | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Jacksonv. St | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Kennesaw St | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Liberty | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| La Tech | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Middle Tenn | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| NM St | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| SHouston St | USC | USC | ||
| UTEP | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| We Kentucky | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| UMass | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame | ||
| UConn | USC | USC | ||
| Akron | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Ball St | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Bowl. Green | USC | USC | ||
| Buffalo | USC | USC | ||
| Cen Michigan | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Ea Michigan | USC | USC | ||
| Kent State | USC | USC | ||
| MiamiOH | USC | USC | ||
| No Illinois | USC | USC | ||
| Ohio | USC | USC | ||
| Toledo | USC | USC | ||
| We Michigan | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | USC | |
| Air Force | USC | USC | ||
| Boise State | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Colorado St | USC | USC | ||
| Fresno St | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Hawaii | USC | USC | ||
| Nevada | USC | USC | ||
| New Mexico | USC | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | USC | |
| San Diego St | USC | USC | ||
| San Jose St | USC | USC | ||
| UNLV | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Utah St | USC | USC | ||
| Wyoming | USC | USC | ||
| Oregon St | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Wash St | USC | USC | ||
| Alabama | Alabama | Alabama | ||
| Arkansas | USC | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Auburn | USC | USC | ||
| Florida | USC | USC | ||
| Georgia | Georgia | Georgia | ||
| Kentucky | USC | USC | ||
| LSU | USC | USC | ||
| Missouri | USC | USC | ||
| Miss St | USC | USC | ||
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Oklahoma | |
| Ole Miss | Ole Miss | Ole Miss | ||
| So Carolina | USC | USC | ||
| Tennessee | USC | USC | ||
| Texas | Texas | Texas | ||
| Texas A&M | Texas A&M | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Texas A&M | |
| Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt | ||
| App St | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Arkansas State | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Coastal Car | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Georgia So | USC | USC | ||
| Georgia St | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| J Madison | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| Louisiana | USC | USC | ||
| Marshall | USC | USC 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Old Dominion | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| So Miss | USC | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | USC | |
| So Alabama | USC | USC | ||
| Texas State | USC | USC | ||
| Troy | USC | USC | ||
| La-Monroe | USC | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | USC | |
| Delaware | USC | USC | ||
| Missouri St | USC | USC |
PowerWise = 119
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.13
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Missouri St ( 7- 5, 71.9) 73-13 -27.95 19.20 -2.67 1.01 33.41
0 H Georgia So ( 7- 6, 71.6) 59-20 -28.26 18.89 -2.67 1.01 32.78
0 A Purdue ( 2-10, 73.8) 33-17 -26.06 21.09 2.67 1.01 48.05
0 H Michigan St ( 4- 8, 75.8) 45-31 -24.09 23.06 -2.67 1.01 41.22
0 A Illinois ( 8- 4, 85.1) 32-34 -14.78 32.37 2.67 1.01 -6.12
0 H Michigan ( 9- 3, 86.2) 31-13 -13.69 33.46 -2.67 1.01 62.25
0 A Notre Dame (10- 2, 95.0) 24-34 -4.93 42.22 2.67 1.01 -1.14
0 A Nebraska ( 7- 5, 79.7) 21-17 -20.19 26.96 2.67 1.01 59.92
0 H Northwestern ( 6- 6, 79.4) 38-17 -20.47 26.68 -2.67 1.01 48.55
0 H Iowa ( 8- 4, 87.9) 26-21 -12.01 35.14 -2.67 1.01 65.64
0 A Oregon (11- 1, 94.0) 27-42 -5.92 41.23 2.67 1.01 -1.64
0 H UCLA ( 3- 9, 77.0) 29-10 -22.94 24.21 -2.67 1.01 43.55
------
426.45
|
winning pts = 435.3500 losing points = -8.8994
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------